Skip to content
PiBye

Who it's for

Using AI on client documents as a lawyer in Canada

Canadian law societies do not ban generative AI, but they expect you to protect confidentiality before using it. Ontario tells licensees to redact identifying client information and to get informed consent if anonymizing cannot adequately protect it. British Columbia prefers omitting identifying information entirely, and Alberta says never to put it in prompts. In practice: remove client identifiers first, review the copy, and verify the output.

Key takeaway: Remove identifying client information before it reaches the AI; consent is the fallback, not the plan.

Last reviewed · 6 sources

What the law societies say

Law Society of Ontario, April 2024: “Carefully consider what information needs to be provided in the generative AI system and redact any identifying, sensitive, or confidential information. If confidentiality or privilege cannot be adequately protected by anonymizing client information, explain the potential risks to your client and obtain your client’s informed consent before using the tool.”

Law Society of British Columbia: client confidential information, “including any information identifying the client, would be omitted from anything that was supplied to the generative AI tool.” Law Society of Alberta: “Never include confidential or potentially identifying information in prompts.”

The Canadian Bar Association’s ethics toolkit adds that “obtaining client consent to the use of generative AI is not a panacea,” and the Barreau du Québec emphasises proactive, transparent communication with clients.

Where lawyers use AI, and what to strip first

Common tasks and the details they tend to carry:

  • Summarizing disclosure or discovery: party and witness names, addresses, dates of birth
  • First drafts of letters and memos: client names, file numbers, opposing counsel
  • Reviewing agreements: party names, signatories, account and property details
  • Preparing chronologies: exact dates, locations and third parties that identify people together

A workflow that matches the guidance

  1. Decide what the task needs; leave out anything it does not.
  2. Replace identifying details with consistent placeholders, on your own computer.
  3. Read the entire copy, including headers, tables and signature blocks.
  4. Use the reviewed copy with the AI tool your firm permits.
  5. Restore names locally, then verify the output as you would a junior’s draft.

Sending completed forms to clients for review

Before a form is filed, the client should confirm what you entered. Sending the fillable file invites accidental edits: a retyped answer, a cleared field, a pressed Reset button, or a viewer that shows the fields blank. A static copy with the answers printed into the page lets the client review exactly what you prepared, while corrections come back to you and go into the fillable original.

For government XFA forms that clients cannot open in Preview, a static copy also means they can review without installing Adobe Reader. File the original form as the issuing body requires; for IRCC barcode forms, that is the validated file from Adobe Reader.

What removing identifiers does not do

It does not make every use appropriate. The Law Society of Ontario’s white paper warns that “anonymizing is not perfect,” and your duties of competence and supervision apply to the AI’s output. Keep your firm’s policy, your client’s instructions and your regulator’s guidance in charge.

Where PiBye fits

How PiBye handles this

PiBye does the stripping and restoring steps on your Mac, so the AI sees the case, not the client. It detects names, addresses, postal codes, dates, SIN, passport and immigration numbers and more, in English and French, including in scanned disclosure, and you approve each replacement.

Your original documents never leave your Mac. Anything you choose to share with an assistant has already been redacted and reviewed by you, and the key that turns tokens back into names stays on your Mac.

PiBye also includes Lock PDF: drop a client’s completed forms and get static copies to send for review, with your fillable originals untouched.

PiBye review screen showing client names and contact details detected in a legal document
PiBye review screen showing client names and contact details detected in a legal document

Actual PiBye views rendered at 3× resolution with fictional sample data. Open full-resolution image ↗

1.0.1 · macOS 14.8.5 or later · Apple Silicon · 1.1 GB

Frequently asked questions

Can Canadian lawyers use ChatGPT?

Yes, with care. Law society guidance focuses on protecting confidential and identifying client information, verifying output, and informed consent where anonymizing is not enough.

Is anonymizing enough to satisfy my obligations?

Not on its own. The Law Society of Ontario says anonymizing is not perfect, and a copy with placeholders you can reverse is pseudonymized, not anonymous. PiBye reduces what you disclose; your judgment about the task, the tool, confidentiality and client consent still applies.

Does PiBye work in French?

Yes. PiBye detects personal information in English and French documents.

Sources

  1. Generative AI: Your professional obligations, Law Society of Ontario, April 10, 2024. Checked 17 September 2026.
  2. Licensee use of generative artificial intelligence (white paper), Law Society of Ontario, April 2024. Checked 17 September 2026.
  3. Guidance on Professional Responsibility and Generative AI, Law Society of British Columbia, October 2023. Checked 17 September 2026.
  4. The Generative AI Playbook, Law Society of Alberta, updated February 2026. Checked 17 September 2026.
  5. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence for the Legal Practitioner: guidelines relating to use, Canadian Bar Association. Checked 17 September 2026.
  6. Transparence et consentement (IA générative), Barreau du Québec. Checked 17 September 2026.